Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS

Jeremy’s Bio:

Jeremy Clark makes developers better. By drawing on over 15 years of experience in application development, he helps developers take a step up in their skillset with a focus on making complex topics approachable regardless of skill level. He is a Microsoft MVP for .NET, and he has authored seven courses for Pluralsight, including “C# Interfaces”, a course aimed at giving developers a clear understanding of abstraction. He loves speaking and has delivered over 200 technical presentations in the last 7 years in the United States and Europe. Jeremy lives in northern Washington with 2 dogs, 2 cats, and a banjo.

Episode Highlights and Show Notes:

Arsalan: Hi everyone. Today my guest is Jeremy Clark how are you, Jeremy?

Jeremy: I’m doing great. Thanks for having me.

Arsalan: It’s so good to have you. I was going to your profile, your website looking at some of the information that we found about you before this interview and I was really amazed that it seems that you’ve done a lot of quality work. You are also a teacher and a mentor. You’ve done a lot of different types of things. I really want our audience to get to know you and really understand where you’re coming from and how you manage all that. I’d also like to hear the story of how you got into independent consulting because that was not planned. You just fell into it. How did that happen?

Jeremy: Yeah. It was not planned at all. I spent the bulk of my development career as a corporate developer at the Disneyland resort and it was a great place to work. I never saw myself as someone who would do contracting or consulting work because I’m not a risk taker. I’m the type of person who needs that regular paycheck every week even though having a regular job is kind of an illusion of safety because we don’t know if the next paycheck is actually coming.

Jeremy: I always felt like I needed that security and I couldn’t go months between paychecks without knowing where my next meal was coming from and things like that. I always saw myself as sitting here and getting a regular paycheck and that’s the way it was going to be. Through a series of small steps, I ended up independent, which is kind of scary. Part of it was that I left that corporate job and workforce startup and part of it was that it was time to start something new. At one time, I managed to save up some money and live within my means, which is always a good challenge to do. I also kind of burnt myself out at that startup. I got to the end of my time there and I realize that I needed to move on to something new because I was burnt out and I needed to relax. I had a friend who said that I needed to quit my job without having a new job. I was like “what? You want me to quit my job without having a new job?” But at the time, I was a senior developer, which is always a good place to be, and there is a good demand for my kind of work. Plus, I did need to break before starting something new. During that time, I started to pursue teaching because get down that’s what I really love to do. I really love to help other developers and make developers better.

Jeremy: So, that’s what I decided to do. I pursued a couple of different paths and I got into cloud teaching and spent some time with that. That didn’t quite work out the way I planned, and I ended up taking a contract job in the meantime and patted the bank account a little more. Then, I ended up with an opportunity to do a Pluralsight course. This was a great opportunity for me because again I wanted to get into teaching. I figured this was a good way for me to show what I could do. I wasn’t really looking at it as a kind of financial solution. I was more looking at it as a marketing and brand building kind of thing because, in the Pluralsight catalog next to these famous people, there’s a little bit of street credit for me.

Jeremy: It turned out that my first course did unexpectedly well for me financially. That gave me the opportunity to do some more courses and I haven’t had a regular paycheck in about four years now. Again, it’s that whole security thing. As it turns out, sometimes you can have that security even though you don’t know when your next gig is coming. A lot of that is because I started speaking within the community. I also started speaking at local code camps. I started regional events in different parts of the US. Then I started speaking at professional events and international events and it’s an interesting trip. Here I am independence. In January, this year, I went to Iceland for a consulting gig. It was for people who had found out about me through various channels.

Jeremy: So, I look back at my life and back in 2010 I was sitting in a cube farm programming. It was a great job, but I look at my life now and it’s like “wow! I’m flying to Iceland to spend a week talking to this team of developers.” It wasn’t intentional, but because of the way that things worked out, it’s just where I ended up. I’m very happy with where I am because it gives me what I need which is to share what I know with other developers and just kind of make it better.

Arsalan: It’s interesting that we have so many different paths that we could follow as new developers. When you’re starting out, when you’re a new developer or still in high school or maybe you’ve switched jobs and you just want to be a programmer or a software developer, you really don’t know what options you have or some of the things that you can do. Those are some of the things that my audience hears struggles with. We don’t know what we don’t know. One of the benefits of having you on this podcast, Jeremy is that they can find out that there are other things that they can do. If they live in an area where there are not many jobs, then they have one option. They can become consultants or do independent work. In your case, you told me that you were consulting with clients that are far away. You are probably also consulting remotely Sometimes. Is that correct?

Jeremy: Yes it is.

Arsalan: You have the opportunity at home and you also can create courses. They sell, and you don’t have to actually do any active work. It’s passive, is that right?

Jeremy: That’s right. The passive income is great because that’s really covering my living expenses right now. What that means is that now I can put my effort into other pursuits like having the opportunity to travel to other parts of the country different people whether it’s having them talk to code schools or to talk to different people on podcasts like yours. It’s nice having that income coming in, but it’s not something that you have to pursue daily. With that said, I know some people who have had great success with it and others who have had moderate to minimal success with it. So, I’ve realized that the position that I’m in is special. I’m very thankful for where I am. But I don’t know if I would’ve been able to actively get to where I am because I just sort of fell into it.

Arsalan: So, sometimes that happens to us. We set out to do one thing and something else happens to us. It just depends. I’ve seen this happen again and again. In fact, seeing that most successful people who call themselves successful fell into what they’re doing. It’s just incredible how many times I’ve heard that. Some will say “I lucked into it. Random stuff just happens to me.” They just do something that they really didn’t think they should do and it works. Then, they drop everything else and get on that bandwagon.

Arsalan: Some people have started companies making a product that they really didn’t want to make, but accidentally made a product. It then turned out to be their flagship product.

Jeremy: I consider myself very fortunate for where I am, but there is also a lot of heading in a direction. So, it’s kind of like what I said about wanting to share my knowledge with other developers. I started out speaking at local code camps and user groups. I started a blog and doing some little YouTube videos and things like that. I’m not exactly sure where I expected to end up. I didn’t end up where I expected to end up, but it’s kind of along the same direction. I don’t think it’s purely random chance. I think that a lot of it is that you create your own luck. Get out there. Talk to people and find out what’s going on. Then, you sort of generate your own luck.

Jeremy: A good example of that that is when I was at that startup. I kind of came to the end of my time there. There were some changes going on in the company. It turned out that I had put in my notice at that company the weekend before code camp. So, I was at a code camp that we can in southern California and talking to the people who I knew from within the community. So, during that time I had about half a dozen people who said “oh, you’re available? Talk to us. We have openings within our company.” I ended up having six leads come out of that. These were people who I knew within the developer community and I just talked to them and met with them at user groups and things like that. That network of people who I didn’t know before has been influential in my career as well.

Arsalan: The key here is that you were out there speaking [to them] and putting yourself out there. First, people know you to be knowledgeable and technically efficient. They know that you can do the job because of the teaching that you do and the writing that you do. Then, you are getting in front of people. If you had the same technical acumen and the same ability but we’re not out there speaking and you weren’t on this podcast and you weren’t writing blogs, then I think you would find yourself in a different situation. You may not have the exposure or the leads. To your point, we really must put ourselves out there if we want to make a change in our lives.

Arsalan: A lot of developers who I’ve talked to, and have known personally, would like to change their situation. Maybe they would like to grow professionally or get into consulting, but they don’t have people coming to them. They don’t have a name. Here’s what I would like to know. [With this question, we are talking about] someone who has been working in the field for years and are at a place where they like to go independent and maybe even make some courses for Pluralsight or some other site or maybe even find their own clients and do some client work, but they don’t have a name and people don’t know them or recognize them, they don’t have a VIP award. Is it possible for these kinds of people to pursue the path that you are on or do they need to do all the things that you did first?

Jeremy: That is a good question. I have a lot of colleagues who are on similar paths, but everyone has their own pace that they go with. The first thing that I would suggest is to find a local Meetup. Talk to other people who are within your developer community, but not people whom you directly work with. That is one way to open your eyes to what is available out there. When it came to [public] speaking, I just didn’t think that I had anything to share because [I was a] corporate developer sitting at a desk, and I don’t want to use the word developer like it’s a negative thing, but I was some kind of corporate developer. I wrote business applications, nothing world changing. I was affecting my users’ lives, but [it was] nothing hugely exciting. Yet, I always thought that I would love to speak and share and things like that. I would go to these big conferences and [think to myself] “oh, it would be awesome to be up on that stage talking to people, but what do I know?”

Jeremy: I was listening to a podcast and they were talking about the .NET world, which is where I lived these days. When .NET first came out, everyone was talking about the basics because C# was a new language, .NET was a new environment, garbage collectors, and how the classic languages worked. Now that that’s been established, people are talking about the latest new technologies in .NET. No one is covering the bids for bringing new developers into the environment or brand-new programmers or people who are coming over from other environments. And [I thought to myself] “you know what, I can teach those basics. I have a good handle on them and a good weight of explaining them.” I took the challenge and I signed up to speak at a code camp that was coming up a few months later. That started it.

Jeremy: I got hooked on it. I realize it isn’t for everyone, but I encourage everyone to try it at least once. If the only thing that is holding you back is [that you think you don’t know enough to get up on stage and talk to people], here’s the secret. None of the other speakers are experts either. The important thing is that you have something that you know that could help somebody else. When I’m talking to somebody and trying to encourage them to go share with they know, I tell them to say something that they wish they had known six months ago. It’s that thing that you struggled through and you finally got over the hurdle and you’re like “I wish someone had told me this six months ago.” That is the topic. You don’t have to know everything about everything. All you must know is one thing more than the people you’re talking to and you can be helpful.

Arsalan: This is great. For everyone listening right now, this is beneficial because you always have something to teach. I’ll give you an example of my seven-year-old kid. She has been programming on Scratch for a couple of years. It’s not really coding the way that we think about it, but it is programming. She is at a point where she is comfortable teaching her three-year-old little sister on how a few things work on Scratch Junior.

Jeremy: That’s awesome.

Arsalan: She’s a teacher. I also started teaching a new class at a K-8 school locally. I’m teaching kids about programming and I want to start awareness between the parents and the students that programming is a valid and legitimate thing that they can pursue for fun or for a career. It’s something that exists. When I was a kid, I didn’t know that it existed. So, I’m trying to teach them, and my daughter is in there and I know that when it comes time to do some things, she’s going to be over there and helping the kindergartners and first graders and even people her age because she has been doing it for over a year and she feels comfortable. That’s incredible for me to think about because since she’s a kid. I’ve been trying to get her into programming, but she wasn’t interested until she started doing it. Now as far as that thing now, for that particular thing that she’s working on, she is an expert to all of the kids who are younger than her.

Jeremy: Right.

Arsalan: If I ask her to talk about what she just learned yesterday and how she made a program she could totally talk about it. For all the other kids have never actually seen any programming, that would be very valuable. It just opens a lot of avenues in my mind. All of us can do this. A lot of us are just shy because we’re thinking to ourselves, “What do I know?”

Jeremy: Right, and what I found was that some of the best articles on my blog are talking about learning something new. So I wanted to learn functional programming and I took so I wanted to learn functional programming and one of the languages that I took was F#. I decided that I was going to go through the first 10 boiler problems, which are standard. I would call them brainteasers, but when you’re learning how to program, it’s mostly mathematical things. Write a Fibonacci sequence and calculate the sum of even numbers up to 100 or something like that. So, I decided that I was going to try to do this using F# in a functional sequence and just say “okay, here are going to be the things that I ran into. Here’s where I ran into a roadblock and here is how I got around it.” I’ve heard some great things about that series from someone in another country asking me if I was going to do any more of those boiler problems because they were following that series. It’s just having someone say that that thing that you did was useful to them.

Jeremy: As far as those boiler problems are concerned, those have been around for a long time and there are thousands and thousands of solutions to those in various languages and people have done them in F# before. They have done them in all the languages before. Putting my process out there of how I went through this is helping other people. It’s awesome to think that something that I would normally be doing can actually impact somebody outside of that. So, you don’t have to get up in front of other people and speak. It could just be a matter of writing some blog articles or maybe putting out a little YouTube video if you’re more comfortable doing talking and live coding things than writing. There are many things that we can do to share what we know. The one hurdle that we do have to get over though is that hurdle of being wrong.

Jeremy: In our industry, we have this fear of being wrong. We have this fear of people coming up to us and saying, “Oh, you’re doing that wrong.” So, we just have to put ourselves out there and realize that we are human, and we are imperfect, this is my process, and if you have a better idea, then great! Share it! If you want to rip me, then go somewhere else. I don’t want to hear about that.” Part of it is just saying that you are going to put yourself out there. It’s scary. You’re going to get some comments that you’re not going to like, but it’s going to be totally worth it in the long run.

Arsalan: You must have somewhat of a thick skin because some people love to bring everybody else down. It’s incredible that it happens, but it happens on Twitter and it’s going to happen anywhere that people are going to post comments.

Jeremy: It really amazes me because I have this video on YouTube, which is An Introduction to Test-driven Development, or Intro to T.D.D. In this drive-by comment, someone said: “this drive-by development is awful.” I was like, “who is this who feels that they need to go to YouTube and find a random video and comment that this technology does not work?” You must realize, first, that you’re not going to please everyone. It was a tough thing for me to get over especially when I was first getting up and speaking in front of people. Then, after you do it enough, you’re going to refine it and find those people you’re targeting. It took me many years to refine and hone into it, but I know who my audience is now.

Jeremy: So, when looking for places to speak, I’m not sure shot-gunning it. [I’m considering] who are the people who are going to most benefit from what I have to say and the way that I normally say it? I know I’m not going to hit those cutting-edge things. I don’t do that leading-edge, new technology stuff. That’s not my thing, but [for others] who do that, more power to them. If I have of .NET programmers who want to get better, then that’s basically my target audience. There are a lot of people out there like that, which is nice. I’ve been able to identify that. Now, when I get the comments that say “Oh, this is too basic,” I can say, “That’s fine.” Yet, there are a lot of people who are getting a lot of benefit out of it. So, being able to separate those people is nearly impossible. I’m still crying inside when someone doesn’t like me, but that rationalization allows me to focus on the people who I am trying to reach.

Arsalan: It’s hard to take it. It happens to me. It happens to everyone. It’s hard to take it. It happens to me. It happens to everyone. Sometimes, you get somebody who just doesn’t like you. It’s that. Sometimes, they are saying things that they don’t mean. So, you must have thick skin. You must be able to focus on the positive people, the people who will give you positive energy versus the people who are pulling you down. That’s going to happen everywhere except when you are in a face-to-face environment or when you’re giving a presentation. You will probably not get those comments from people who are present. Virtual people like to throw all kinds of things that you.

Jeremy: Yeah, and the nice thing about code camps are an awesome place to start speaking if that’s what you want to do because first, it’s free and people aren’t expecting things. In fact, I always offer people things like a “double your money back guarantee” if they don’t like my topic. Plus, everyone in the room wants you to succeed. They don’t want to sit there and waste an hour. They want you to succeed. They want to learn something from you. Everyone is rooting for you there. Again, not everyone is going to walk out getting what they wanted out of the topic or the presentation or whatever. So, generally, there’s a very good positive energy in the room. Nobody wants time. They want you to succeed.

Arsalan: I did want to ask Pluralsight also about the MVP award. Did you have the MVP when you approached Pluralsight?

Jeremy: So, by timeline, yes, I was awarded an MVP before Pluralsight. As far as Pluralsight is concerned, they don’t really care who you are. They want to know if you can teach. That is one thing that I found that was nice. They have an audition process, and anyone can go through the audition process. You go to their website and somewhere on there you can click to show that you want to be an author. You go through a process where they send you some instructions and you do a sample video and then they will see if you can teach. They don’t care who you are. They want to know that you can teach.

Jeremy: If you want to talk about the technical aspect of presentations and whatnot, they do a-peer-to-review system where there are some people who are experts in those technologies will view to determine if something is way off when it comes to the technology, not for 100% correctness. So, the MVP idea and Pluralsight are an interesting mixture. MVP awards are basically Microsoft recognizing people who contribute to the developer community. So, through my speaking, my blogs, and things like that, that is how I was initially awarded that. I’ve been an MVP for six years now. So, it’s been great. So, Pluralsight and MVP have interesting aspects to each other, but I would not say that one requires the other.

Arsalan: Do you remember your first encounter with programming?

Jeremy: Yes, I do and it’s just because I was thinking about this a couple of years ago. I’d like to say that first experience with programming was with my dad. He brought home an Apple II that was left over from work and I started programming some Basic and that was my first programming thing. But, you know what, that’s not what it was, and this is going to show how old I am now. So, I apologize for that. I had a ¾ gray beard, but I just shaved so I look a lot younger now. I trace my first programming experience back to CRISP 79, which seems a lot longer ago now. I got this toy called a ‘Big Track.’ It was basically a programmable tank. It was a tank that had six wheels and the little LED thing on the front and it had a CAD on the back. It was a number pad. So, it was several arrows and you would punch in a program for what this thing was supposed to do. You would program it to go forward a certain number of lengths for each vehicle and you could say ‘right 90°.’ So, it would go right 90° and then go forward five or….and then fire the little fake laser thing in front. It was horribly frustrating, but I found out that I was a programmer because first, there was no going back and fixing a program because there was a splay. It was just a matter of programming it and hitting go. There was no ‘go back and debug because line 3 was wrong.’

Jeremy: So, I found myself writing out my instructions on a piece of paper before I typed them into this little keypad. That was my first experience that real life doesn’t always match theory. If you say ‘go forward and turn 90°, it’d turn 85° or 96°, depending on the surface that it was on. These were on plastic wheels and so if it was on carpet it would do one thing and if it was on the tile it would do something else and slide around a little. So, if you told it to turn 90° and it only turned 80° and plows into the coffee table rather than going around it. So, the way you debugged it was by going back and telling it to go 100° rather than 90°. I look back at this and wondered how I ever survived that because that was just a little programming experience. Yet, I guess that was just the time that I found out that I liked doing things like that and I wasn’t completely frustrated by it.

Arsalan: Some of my best experiences were when I was young, and I wanted to do programming. I had access to a computer growing up, but I think back in the day we didn’t have all these instructions. We didn’t have the iPhones and the iPads, and we didn’t have cable TV. Well, I didn’t have cable TV. We didn’t have anything. So, all I had was what was in front of me. I think it would be good if we could find a way to make things simpler again at least for kids so they could focus on things and not get distracted all the time.

Jeremy: Yeah, that’s an interesting challenge. There are times when I’m like “That’s great! I have the entire internet open to me. So, I can solve this programming problem.” But, at the same time, part of me wants to go back to 1980-whatever when I’m typing in basic instructions that were printed out in the back of a magazine. So, you just typed in these programs and you learned to debug based on how badly you typed and by going through them. That’s how we got programs, you know. There was nowhere to download stuff from. You had to type them in yourself.

Jeremy: I didn’t have a lot. So, I always had old computers. That Apple II that I talked about, it was well past its prime by the time that I got a hold of it. You know what’s great? Having a computer that you can hook up to a television set. Oh man, now I feel old.

Arsalan: Yeah. We’ve all heard about it or done it. We are lucky that we are in an era where we can have high definition screens on our desks. Even 20 years ago, that would’ve been the stuff of dreams.

Jeremy: Oh yeah.

Arsalan: So, did you study computer programming, computer science, or any other related field in a formal environment?

Jeremy: No and that was interesting because I am, for the most part, a self-taught programmer. So, like I said, I did hobby programming and back in the day, I ran a bulletin board system where you would basically modem into a specific computer to do stuff. That was quite a thing back in the day. How I got programming for real was that my brother worked for a software distributor. One day he drops this gigantic box in my room. He told me it was a compiler. It was a C++ compiler. I installed it and there were command lines of C++ and I ended up writing some little programs for his bulletin board. I wrote a multiple choice, trivia quiz. It was fun, but it was my first foray into programming for real.

Jeremy: Back in college, I was an English major. I don’t regret that at all because it taught me critical thinking skills that became very useful to me as a programmer. Then, when I decided that I wanted to do programming as a profession, I realized that I didn’t have any formal training and wasn’t sure how I was going to get my foot in the door. That was something that, I don’t want to say that I lucked into to, but I was in the right place at the right time and kind of pursuing a path.

Jeremy: I ended up on the user side of a project. So, I was working at the Disney Land Resort and I was on the user side of this big, resort-wide system that we were doing. I was doing the requirements meetings and I was building some little things and access according, so we could figure out what our requirements were. The develop manager saw that I had the right mindset and I was asking the right types of questions. So, she had a junior position open. So, I said “Awesome! I will take that!” I would say that I got started late as a developer. I wasn’t a developer until I was 29 years old. Most people that you are practically over the hill at that point and that was just when I was beginning my professional journey.

Jeremy: I am very fortunate because that team that I ended up on was focused on going forward. So, everyone was thinking about how we could propel ourselves forward and meet our users’ needs that best way that we can. Everyone was sharing. So, the senior developers were sharing with the people who knew less than they did. So, it was an inspiring growth environment. I attribute how rapidly I was able to progress as someone with no formal training to that and I wish that more people could have access to that. I realize that was a rare experience that I got to experience. It was awesome!

Arsalan: That is amazing that you had the opportunity and found yourself in the right place and at the right time. I have had a lot of other people tell me similar stories, not the same. If you work at a company that deals in technology or maybe have a technology, they may need someone to build some custom applications for them.

Arsalan: It appears to be a common pattern. Some places just need someone to write some Excel or Access or some Visual Basic, or something simple. Some places may have websites, or, in your case, more. The lesson that I take from this is this. Let’s say that you are out, or you are a student, and you want to do software development, but you don’t have any experience or training. So, you get a job in a different position, but you know that this company has a department where they hire developers. There is an opportunity for you to work within the system and either apply for an open position or maybe have a good working relationship with managers there in those departments.

Arsalan: I’ve seen it happen time and again where people go from something completely unrelated to software development or to testing and then they work up. Eventually, they all end up in the same place. Once you have a little bit of experience, then nobody asks how you got that experience or whether you have a degree. Nobody asks if you have a master’s degree or a Ph.D.

Arsalan: I spent many years studying computer science and computer engineering. It turns out that it wasn’t needed for the job, at least. So, I think that’s a good lesson for all of us to learn, especially for those who are listening to this podcast right now and they are apprehensive about getting a job somewhere. Go get the job. Having a job is important. Being jobless is no fun.

Jeremy: You reminded me of the steps before that because when I started at Disneyland resort, I was making hotel reservations. That was my first job there. I was using a scheduling system. I hate to use the scheduling system, but basically, the manager was going through an Excel sheet and typing in the schedule for everyone. Because of seniority and other things, if someone changed their position, she had to rearrange everything and fill in the schedules all over again.

Jeremy: It was this huge manual process. I knew some Excel and I built a pivot table. I told her to just type in the schedule in the pivot table and that would turn it into a grid. It was little things like that where you could save time that is valuable in the long run. I don’t know that the little schedule spreadsheet got me the programming job, but it was small steps to, first, prove to myself that I could be technologically useful and to prove that to other people as well.

Jeremy: So, there are some things that you can do even if they are technologically out of your realm. I see my job as a developer to make the world a better place. That’s just me making other people’s jobs easier.

Arsalan: So, that was your first job as a junior developer. You were excited. You have never done it. You are 29 years old. I don’t know how people reacted to that, but a lot of people who I know would not necessarily react very positively to joining their company, their closed knit group with little to no experience. It happens to a lot of us. Getting accepted and viewed as a valued member, an equal and contributing member to each team, take some effort. How is that experience for you?

Jeremy: Like I said, I was on a very welcoming and open team. So, it was probably smoother for me than what a lot of other people go through.  it will take time before you become useful in the department. Realize that if you are brand-new to the area, you’re going to be a drag on the area for a while. So, just because it is in of that. That’s not necessarily that you are a new developer, it might be because you’re new to the industry.

Jeremy: When I took a contracting job in a completely new industry, I didn’t know how anything about these people’s line of business works. Although I was rock-solid as a developer, and the skills that they needed, it was a learning process in determining how they did things. I think I think that the key to becoming a successful developer is absorbing knowledge. You must want to learn. You can learn the technologies. You can learn about the business space area. You can learn whatever the problem space it.

Jeremy: There are so many things out there to learn, but you must be willing to do it. If somebody must keep handing you things that you need to learn, you’re not going to be successful. Yet, if you go and find new things to learn and start participating and that experience, the other developers are going to see that you are serious. You will be showing that you are interested in improving and getting better and wanting to be a productive member of the team. That attitude goes a long way toward softening those people who might be a little harder towards that.

Arsalan: Were you completely on your own or did you have a mentor over there?

Jeremy: It was kind of weird because we tried to set up a mentoring relationship where everyone was paired up in the department, but it didn’t last very long. So, it was more of an informal thing. Different people on the team had different areas of specialty.

Jeremy: So, when I first joined the team, I was given reporting because it’s hard to delete data if you’re doing reporting. It is easier to hang a server, though. I’ve hung servers while doing reporting before. Yet, it’s something that you can approach, and you can learn how the data is set up and people looking for you to get it on a piece of paper and things like that. During the initial process, I am talking to people who know the system, the data that I’m working with so that I can understand how the relationships work and things like that. I’m talking to people who know the tool.

Jeremy: We were using Crystal reports. So, I was able to tap into these people to do the different areas that I needed to learn. Then, eventually, I would be able to do programming. When I first started programming, we were using Delphi and doing some actual language programming. So, we were getting more into the actual application space. It was more of an informal system where we were sharing with each other and we would pair when we ran into problems.

Jeremy: Now, as a senior developer, I’ve heard about these teens who have a 15-minute rule and I really like the idea of this. During the 15 minutes before you asked somebody how to do something, you must spend at least 15 minutes looking for a solution on your own. That could include looking on Google, Stack Overflow, or the software that you have in your environment. So, you must spend at least 15 minutes trying to find an answer before asking someone else. So that gets you past always asking somebody else for help and helps you figure it out.

Jeremy: On the flip side of the 15-minute theory, if you spend more than 15 minutes looking for something, you must ask for help. So, that prevents people from getting stuck. It also promotes that sharing environment. That way, someone isn’t sitting there spinning for two hours being stuck on a problem. They are asking for help and other people are used to asking for help and giving help. Again, it depends on your teammates wanting to be involved in that, but I like the idea of doing some due diligence first and realizing when you get stuck and then asking someone for help.

Arsalan: That’s good advice. I’m not seeing both sides of the equation. I’ve been on both ends of this divide. I’ve been the one asking and the one being asked these questions. The problem is that, for the people who are new developers, the person that you are asking also has his or her own tasks. Everybody is under the gun. That’s what happens.

Arsalan: The problem is that sometimes they are deep in their process and if you interrupt them, not only do you break their flow and sometimes that means that something gets delayed for them, which further adds to their stress and therefore their response to you may not be as favorable. So, I think it’s good to have some type of process. One of the companies that I worked at had this umbrella process. It rained a lot in Chicago, so everyone had umbrellas. If it was on the desk, that meant not to bother them.

Jeremy: Yeah. I like that. This is one of the things that I miss from being in a cube environment. It’s nice when you can pop your head up over the cube wall to look at the person and figure out what’s going on, once you have some experience and you can see it. You can tell if they are deep in meditation while trying to solve a problem or if they’re just looking at the whiteboard or if they are talking to a client or whatever. You can get that visual of how busy this person is before you approach them. Considering I’m working remotely with people, I’m not quite as comfortable with that. I feel like I might be interrupting you if you’re deep in thought. I do miss popping my head up over the wall to see if that person is available or not. So, yeah, the umbrella method does sound pretty good.

Arsalan: If you could start over, is there anything that you would do differently?

Jeremy: I learned many things the hard way. As someone who likes helping the next generation of developers, I love telling people the problems that I ran into and the things I wish I could avoid, but I know that people won’t listen to me and they’re going to have to experience those problems themselves. The advice I usually give has to do with best practices. Before I say anything further, I hate the term best practices because it implies that this is the right thing to do in all circumstances. When I was a new developer, I always thought that best practices applied to academic people and not to regular programmers. So, I proceeded to make huge messes. I eventually realized that the people who had for 30 years or more might know something more than I do. So, I would encourage people to understand the best practices.

Jeremy: I don’t always follow them, but not because I don’t want to use them, but rather, it’s because I know that they don’t apply to the specific situation that I am in. So, listen to your elders. I know that I’m kind of in with the elders, but that’s self-serving. That’s what I wish I would’ve paid more attention to when I was younger. The first solo application that I did in this one department, I was doing a start to finish reporting application. I ended up putting all the logic in the code behind the main form of the application. When I was building it, I figured that it was a simple application, and this wouldn’t be a big deal. Yet, as it got bigger and bigger, I then had 700 lines of code in this one form. I had to reap the benefits of that because I supported the application for many years. It was a moment when I wished that I could have gone back to do it over again and have things in different places based on functionality. Yet, I don’t know if I would’ve learned my lesson without making that mistake. So, I don’t know what a good answer to that is.

Arsalan: I have two little girls. There are arguments or debates between my wife and me about what to do if they are doing something potentially dangerous. My wife’s point of view is to allow them to fall and get hurt and learned the lesson. I like that approach. In general, but then it gets to a point where I feel it’s a little too dangerous and I want to enforce some rules. So, I think there’s a balance here. The people who you and I are talking about, who read blogs and take your courses, or listen to this podcast, or do this, may not always understand this. It’s always a good idea to try it if you’re unsure, then if you fall flat on your face then you’ll know it’s not a good thing and you’ll learn a lesson. However, sometimes it’s beneficial to listen to people who have been there and take their word on it. Often you can save yourself so much trouble and heartache if you could avoid the big problems. I wish I had.

Arsalan: You were mentioning, that as a new developer or just as a young person, that you are so full of self-confidence sometimes and think you know everything. I’ve suffered from that. I just want to believe my own experiences, but sometimes it’s better. There are patterns and there are anti-patterns but we’re not going to go into this. When you’re looking at software development, there are ways of building good software that is just bad. They’re not all bad, but they are generally bad. So, I think it’s good knowledge. The best way to do that is by listening to podcasts, watching YouTube videos, reading blog posts, and all that other stuff that’s out there that Jeremy Clark and other people like him are putting out.

Arsalan: So, Jeremy, are there any podcasts, YouTube channels, or any other places on the internet that people can glean wonderful information?

Jeremy: Yes. There’s a lot of good stuff out there, but there’s also a lot of bad stuff out there. I like Pluralsight because they go through that vetting process. So, it’s not random content on YouTube. It’s curated content where they have found people who know how to teach a topic and are not confusing things.

Jeremy: Another thing that Pluralsight does is that they don’t have multiple courses on the same topic. So, you’re not looking at 32 courses on how to do Angular 2 or Angular 5 or whatever the version number is up to at the time. They are all more targeted and there are one overview course and a lot of specific courses. So, you don’t have several overview courses to pick from. If you are a video learner, then I highly recommend Pluralsight.

Jeremy: Unfortunately, I am not a video learner. I figured my brain doesn’t work at the same speed as video. Basically, my brain speeds up and slows down and video runs at a constant speed. So, for me, print media is the best way for me to learn whether it’s blog articles or paper books. I’m one of those people who still like paper books where you can flip back and forth between pages. Find out the best way that you learn and try to get yourself into the environment where you will learn best. I’m kind of a book person. So, I talked to a lot of my friends about the resources within the community to see what other people are doing and recommending. That’s what I do.

Arsalan: That’s good to know. Pluralsight is very good. You can check out Jeremy’s courses, and we can put the links to Jeremy’s courses on our webpage for this episode. It’ll be in the notes with the transcript of our interview and all the links. If you have a promo code, you can share that with us if you’d like and we’ll make sure that it’s on that page.

Jeremy: I’ll make sure to get you those links.

Arsalan: Awesome. So, we’re finally at the close. It’s been a lengthy interview. I’m grateful to you for giving us so much of your time today. Before we close, I still have a couple of interesting questions that I think our audience could benefit from. One of the things that I’ve noticed is that you are focused on .NET. .NET is not one technology. It is a suite of technologies. It doesn’t appear that you have diverged from your focus, which is a very good thing. I would like you to talk about how you keep up with things and how you decide which new technologies to learn. What do you do? What’re your criteria? Also, give us some advice on how to learn new things.

Jeremy: The first thing to understand is that I cannot know everything. That was a hard lesson for me to learn. I think what I want to focus on. I like to attend user groups, code camps and community events and talk to people about what technologies they are using, what’s interesting, and what’s exciting. I ask myself, what makes me happy? In the current world, I’ve developed an interest in machine learning and functional programming.

Jeremy: Although I’ve talked about using F# earlier, I’ve started learning Haskell for functional programming. Part of the reason I did that is to get out of the .NET environment. That way I don’t confuse functional bits with .NET bits. Most of the work that I would be doing would be in the F# world. I dabbled in Scala and a couple of other things. I’ve also seen some cool things out there that I haven’t had a chance to dabble in.

Jeremy: So, people ask me which technologies they should learn. I usually explore a couple of different things. I asked them if there is a specific industry that excites them. Do you want to be in medical devices? Do you want to be in entertainment? Do you want to be in finance? If there’s a specific industry that you want to be in, go and find out which technologies they are using. Then, start exploring those. That’s one direction that you can go in if you are looking at a specific industry.

Jeremy: Another way is this. Ask yourself what types of programming are you interested in? Are you interested in the hard-core computational stuff? Do you like the UI design and presentation and trying to figure out how to interact with your users? Do you like the service, communication or service bus type of stuff that’s kind of in the middle? Then, look at what’s available in those worlds. I love XMAL as a UI technology. Desktop-based and people might see that as limiting, but there are a lot of Windows machines out there. For people out there who like a broader reach, there’s the web. The web is the hugest reach we have. So, if you like the client side of things, JavaScript for programming presentation logic. That’s a huge area to explore. Either focus on an industry or a technology that makes you happy. I try to encourage people to do things they love. While we all need jobs, we also need to do things that we find fulfilling. Did that answer the question? I feel like I’m talking in circles.

Arsalan: I think that is a great answer because it’s hard to answer questions like these because we want to know how you picked a technology and or are so many things that excite you. I think there’s also the aspect of which industry you want to go into because where is the money? Ultimately, you could do something for fun or you could say that you want to do it professionally and you need to learn certain types of technologies because that is how a means becomes an end. Some people have different motivations. If you are just starting out or are a new developer, if you are young or looking to establish yourself, then I encourage you to focus on things that will get you a job. Focus on things that will get you noticed. You need to make your mark. Once you have done that, then it’s okay to branch out into things that interest you. When you’re getting yourself established, the first four or five years are the hardest. In our industry, it is hard to find senior people. So, it gets easier with time.

Jeremy: Oh yeah. It does. I wholeheartedly agree. I would say that JavaScript is the place to be right now, but there are a lot of corporate developers out there right now and .NET is huge in the corporate industry. So, it might also depend on which part of the country you’re in. If you are in the Silicon Valley area, then a lot of the open source technologies and some of the more niche languages and languages that aren’t quite as widespread are things to look at. Yet, if you’re working at a bank, then they are going to be using JavaScript and .NET for a lot of the backend stuff. There are a lot of corporate jobs out there. I was a corporate developer for 11 years and I am proud of that. There’s nothing wrong with that.

Arsalan: So, how can people get in touch with you, Jeremy?

Jeremy: You can find me under Jeremy Bytes everywhere online including my website: Jeremybytes.com and also on Twitter. Each I do quite a bit of speaking so I travel the US and venture internationally from time to time. On my website, there are also links to my YouTube channel where I have some screencasts on various topics, as well as my Pluralsight courses. That’s pretty much the one place to go to find out where I’m going to be.

Arsalan: All right. Jeremy Bytes everywhere on the Internet. That’s a good lesson in branding. I am so excited to have Jeremy here and be able to talk to him about some of the questions that our audience has. If you are listening to this podcast and are really excited about learning or you want to learn more about Jeremy or check out his courses, or if you want to see a number of our other guests, our previous guest was Reuven Lerner and we talked about Regular Expressions and he’s an expert in that, if you just want to let know how to get started, you can send me an e-mail@us.mentoringdevelopers.com. You can also tweet at us at @MentoringDevs. Let us know what you think about this episode and if there’s a specific person that you would like us to talk to would like to pursue that as well.

Arsalan: All right, Jeremy. It was so nice to talk to you today.

Jeremy: Thanks for having me.

Important Links

• Jeremy Bytes Website
• Jeremy Bytes – Pluralsight
• Jeremy Clark—YouTube
• Meetup
• Pluralsight
• Scratch

Thanks for Listening!

Do you have some feedback or some advice for us or our audience? Please give us a review on iTunes or Stitcher and share your thoughts.

If you found this episode useful, please go ahead and share it with your friends and family. You can do that easily using the social media buttons at the bottom of this page.

Subscribe to the show on iTunes or Stitcher (for Android users) to automatically get new episodes every Tuesday.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS

Damian’s Bio:

Damian is a Cloud Developer Advocate specializing in DevOps. After spending a year in Toronto, Canada, he returned to Australia – the land of the dangerous creatures and beautiful beaches – in 2018.

Formerly a dev at Octopus Deploy and a Microsoft MVP, he has a background in software development and consulting in a broad range of industries. In Australia, he co-organized the Brisbane .Net User Group and launched the now annual DDD Brisbane conference. He regularly speaks at conferences, User Groups, and other events around the world, and is an occasional guest on various podcasts like .NET Rocks and Hanselminutes.

Damian has his own Channel 9 show – The DevOps Lab. Check it out for real-world guidance on implementing DevOps in your organization!

Most of the time you’ll find him talking to developers and IT Pros to help them get the most out of their DevOps strategies.

Episode Highlights and Show Notes:

Arsalan: Hi, Everyone. Today, my guest is Damian Brady. Damian, how are you?

Damian: I’m good, thank you. How are you?

Arsalan: Doing fantastic. And, you are not in the US. You are actually somewhere else. Where are you right now?

Damian: I’m in Australia at the moment, on the East coast in a place called New Castle, which is about two hours North of Sydney.

Arsalan: Right. Is it true that it’s summertime over there? It’s hot and sunny where you live?

Damian: Yeah, it’s very much summer time. It’s been 30-something degrees every day, which is Celsius. I can’t do the conversion. We’re talking 90’s [in Fahrenheit], I think.

Arsalan: Wow. I live in Ohio and we’ve had lots of snowstorms this time of the year. We are not very far from Canada, where you lived for a while. What were you doing there?

Damian: I was living in Toronto for 12 months, basically for my wife’s work. I went over there with her. I’m lucky enough to be able to work pretty much from anywhere in the world. So, I went over there for a year and we just got back to Australia maybe two weeks ago. It was a bit of a change. It was -28 Celsius, which is probably pretty close to that in Fahrenheit when we left Toronto. It was plus 30, in the 90’s I think, when we got to Brisbane, where I used to live in Australia and then we came down to New Castle, which is where I’m living now.

Arsalan: Yeah, the world is a large place and the climates are so different. It’s just amazing to meet people from different parts of the world and it’s really good to have someone from Australia on our podcast. We haven’t had that before.

Arsalan: You currently work for Microsoft. What’s your title again?

Damian: I’m a cloud developer advocate for Microsoft.

Arsalan: We’re going to unpack that in a little bit, but first, I want to hear from you about something interesting that happened to you in your career as you were starting out when you were a student. You were in college and you were working on a voting system for the Australian elections. What happened there?

Damian: Yeah, it was interesting. I was in the third year of my IT degree. We had a group project, which involved a few people. We set up our tasks. The project was to write an electronic voting system. So, everyone would submit their votes and it would follow the Australian Federal Voting System, which has preference allocations and all sorts of fancy stuff that happens with Australian elections.

Damian: My part of the project was to write the algorithm that actually counted the votes. It was right up my alley, but I needed to get a couple of questions answered. Mainly, the biggest one was what happens if two people have exactly the same number of votes? So, I went to the Political Science department at the university and spoke to a professor there. It shocked me at the time that there wasn’t actually an answer.

Damian: The answer that he gave me was “we would do a recount and then there’s a different number that comes out.” This is fine for, well, I don’t know that it’s fine, but it’s understandable when you have a bunch of humans counting paper votes. But the computer is probably not going to get a different answer each time. So, I think what that taught me was that without that conversation, I probably would’ve just made an assumption or skipped that requirement or something. But, having that conversation with somebody who might end up using that system was really important in finding out what bits needed to be defined. The conversation is what is needed to happen to get the real software working the way that people needed it to work.

Arsalan: I think the biggest difference that I see between someone starting out in software development and a veteran is that the veterans are more jaded. They tend not to trust the initial set of requirements that are given and they know that when they dig deeper and think about the problem in detail when they actually show the user how a potential system will work, sometimes our understandings are different. Until you dig deeper, you really don’t know.

Arsalan: It’s not all about writing code, right? It’s more than that. It’s about doing the right thing and sometimes it’s hard to know and maybe that is the hardest thing in software development.

Damian: Yes, absolutely. I’ve done a bunch of jobs over the last 15 years or so. I think that writing code is the bit that everyone can do. Actually, having conversations with people and realizing that exploring the requirements are a bit more than what’s just written on the paper is a necessary part of it. We’ve always heard the thing in software development where the user or product owner doesn’t know what they want. They ask for something and you deliver that exact thing. Then, they decide that they didn’t want that after all. That’s just a known thing with more experienced developers, I suppose. But, whether you become jaded and say “I’m not going to get this right. I might as well write the best code I can” or whether you go the other way and say “well, the best thing to do would be to work together and have a conversation and sit down with the person and deliver something really early that they can see and shape the direction that they want the software to go.” That’s kind of the two directions that I’ve seen people go in software development a lot of the time.

Arsalan: Right. So, the modern trend, especially in smaller organizations, is to use Agile methodologies. By that, they mean that they are not going to assume that they know exactly what to do up front. They are going to assume that they don’t [know] and they are going to take it one step at a time.

Arsalan: Let’s say that they are going to iterate. So, imagine that there’s a for-loop going a hundred times. Every time, you learn a little bit more and then you make a little more of that software. That is something not thought up in a meeting with a standards committee who has decided that we need to do this. We are doing this because we have found that all other methods are not working.

Damian: Yeah. Agile kind of came out of the acknowledgment that at the start of the project, that’s when you know the least about what’s happening. You know the least about what the requirements really are at the start. So, the idea of defining everything to the nth degree up front and then trying to implement that in another period of 6 months or 12 months is inevitably going to lead to something which maybe isn’t exactly what you needed at the time. So, Agile was a reaction to that. We said, “let’s acknowledge that and accept it and do it iteratively.”Like you said, let’s just do a little bit at a time and realize that we’re fallible as humans. We may not know everything up front and we can change the direction based on what’s happening in the environment as well.

Arsalan: Right. So, I want to change tracks a little bit. I want to talk to you about your initial days and how you started, not just how you got your first job. Why did you want to be a developer? What was your first encounter with programming? When did you first realize that is a thing that somebody can do?

Damian: Well, I was fairly lucky, actually. My dad was interested in technology. He’s a solicitor, or lawyer, in Australia. He was really interested in these new computer things that were being made available to the public. So we had a computer in our home quite early. It was an old one from my dad’s work. Then at some point, we got an Omega 500 and dad and I bonded over writing code. It was Omega Basic. We were buying computer magazines. At the time, that was how you learned to write code. You’d buy a computer magazine and then there’d be a few pages of code that you’d have to copy to get something worth working.

Damian: Then, I realized that you could tweak little bits of that code and make changes. It kind of became this thing that felt really powerful – to be able to make this device do what you wanted it to do. It was just little games and things like that. So, it was really early. It was probably when I was around 10 or so when I would’ve written my first software that was my own code, I think. That was the initial exposure to this world of computers and programming.

Damian: I maintained an interest while I was at school and high school, but I actually went into music after high school. I got this false impression at the university that writing code was going to be turning up every day and typing stuff out based on really strict specifications that were sitting next to me. [I figured] that it would just be this really boring thing, almost like data entry, I think.  That was an incorrect impression that I have since learned, but at the time, that’s what I thought software development was. So, I went and did a year at the Conservatory of Music in Brisbane until I realized that doing that all day, every day was really taking the enjoyment out of doing music. I experimented with a few other degrees and a few other courses at the university and found programming again as one of the courses that I did. Then, I went straight back to that and I’ve been there ever since.

Arsalan: That’s great. What kinds of music were you interested in? Were you an instrumentalist?

Damian: Yeah. I actually played jazz trombone. [It was] a slightly unusual one, but I think the main reason why I started playing that [was that] my dad played trombone. So, we had one in the house, which was very convenient, but I also learned piano when I was younger. I played piano and trombone, but I haven’t picked that up in about 10 years. So, I don’t know whether I could [play] anymore. It was jazz, mainly. I still enjoy jumping on the piano and playing what I hear on the radio.

Arsalan: That’s great! For the longest time, I wanted to play the electric guitar. It’s typical. There is nothing unusual about this. The reason why I got into programming was that I wanted to make video games, which is also very typical, and I wanted to be a rock star.

Arsalan: I wanted to play the electric guitar. I never had an electric guitar until I had a friend who was a very good guitarist. I was buying a guitar for him because he needed a car. So, I drove him to a guitar store and we were looking for guitars. I said “hey, do you think you could help me buy an old guitar for myself?” So, I ended up buying a guitar. It was a very cheap Squire, but I loved it. I was horrible at it because I never took a lesson.

Arsalan: I enrolled in college. I was in college and figured that maybe I would change majors and they would teach me how to become a musician and how to play guitar. I was music major. So, I went through the requirements and it turns out that you already need to be a good enough musician before they’d let you in. I was confused. I was thinking “what’s the point? If I’m really good, then I don’t need to go.” So, that was a really interesting part of my life. So, I have a tremendous respect for musicians, especially the ones who go to music school because they are already pretty good.

Damian: Yeah. I had lessons. I did all that stuff before that phase of my life. So, when I went there, I thought I was pretty good. When I went to the conservatory, I found out that I was not actually very good at all. I was quite good at the theory, which has a bit of a math component to it. But if you put me on the stage next to any other trombone player in that entire building, and probably a bunch of people who don’t play trombone, I was probably not going to be in the top half of the players on the stage. There’s a very good chance that I would’ve been the worst trombone player in the building at that time. So, I completely appreciate what you mean. The standard just to get into those things was really quite higher than I could cope with in the long term. Yeah, you already need to be able to play.

Arsalan: So, you didn’t do a music major. Did you go to school and get a computer science or computer engineering degree? What were you doing there in college?

Damian: After the conservatory, I decided on my ability and how much I was enjoying it, I was never going to be able to make a living from this. It was not really helping my love of music. So I went to the university and enrolled in a general science/bachelor of science degree.

Damian: I did a bunch of really unusual and unrelated subjects. I did philosophy. I did a chemistry subject. I did physics and biology, and I did an IT subject. I did an algorithms subject and that was the one I loved. So, I thought that maybe I had just gotten the wrong idea about the profession. So, I switched my degree to a bachelor of information technology, which is what it was at the time. It was a little more business-oriented programming, I supposed, rather than computer science. I saw a lot of stuff on databases and algorithms. But, I also saw some things on project management and that kind of thing. I ended up with a bachelor of information technology.

Arsalan: Do you think it helped you in your career?

Damian: A little bit. To be perfectly honest, I think I learned a little more in the first six months of actual working than I did in that four-year degree. There are a few science-related things like O notation for the complexity of algorithms and things like that that I can still rely on my knowledge of that and my learning of that. For the most part, I think most of the practical knowledge that I have was learned on the job.

Damian: I’m glad that I did the degree. It got me interested in the subject again. It helped me learn how to learn, I suppose. But I don’t think that it was completely necessary at all for a software development career.

Arsalan: Yeah. This is a theme that I observe in a lot of the interviews that I do here for Mentoring Developers. It turns out that you don’t really need a programming degree, or computer science, or computer engineering, or any kind of IT degree to find success. Apparently, a lot of my superiors in my career don’t have anything to do with computer science as far as their education goes. Yet, that has not hindered them [in becoming] more successful than I was because they were managing me and nobody ever cared. I, on the other hand, went to college and graduate school. I studied for years trying to learn as much as I could. Then, when I got out, I realized that I didn’t need to do that.

Damian: Yeah. It was a little difficult at the time to get a job in software development. This was 15 years ago in Brisbane, Australia. It was difficult to get a software development job if you didn’t have a degree. You would have to enter a company, maybe, as a technician or support person or something like that and work your way in. But that was at that time. I think the trend is changing. I think people are realizing that if you can prove that you are a good software developer, there is no real reason to have a degree attached to what you’re doing, which I think is a good change. I don’t think it should be a requirement, necessarily.

Arsalan: Right. So, in the US, what I’ve noticed is that a lot of companies want their new employees to have a college degree, but not necessarily in computer science or computer engineering.  What they are looking for is someone who is educated in other ways, understands how to deal with people, and has a level of comprehension. They feel that is a good differentiator. They get thousands of resumes per job and they don’t want to go through them. So, they feel like it’s worthwhile to have that as a filter.

Arsalan: But, having said that, I know a lot of people who never went to college and they are very successful. The reason that they are successful is that they were able to get their first job maybe through contacts or maybe they worked their way up from QA and just got their foot in the door somehow. They proved themselves and very soon the company, maybe, needed twice as many people. It was very easy for them to move up.

Arsalan: A lot of times I have noticed, in these days for the past 10 years, that you are able to work on your projects even if nobody is hiring you. Then, you can show people what you can do because we have the internet now. If you can show people what you can do, then you can show people your code using Github. All of a sudden, we have the ability to promote and market ourselves.

Damian: Yeah, absolutely.  Github, or something along those lines, [provides] a much better indicator of the code that someone writes [rather] than the fact that they have a degree. I knew a handful of people who finished the degree that I finished and I don’t think that they’d really be able to write code. It wasn’t really a requirement. You could get through the degree program without being able to write software. So, saying that you have a degree doesn’t mean that you’re going to be a great developer. Whereas, if you have an example of code out there, on Github for example, it’s something real and tangible that someone can look at and say “well, yes, here is code that works and it looks like this and it has a nice architecture and the person knows what they are doing.”

Damian: Having said that, I know there has been a bit of a trend lately as well. That is, if you’re applying for a job, show us your Github account so we can have a look at all the code that you have written. So, there is almost a pressure for people to write code in public even if their day-to-day job doesn’t allow them to do that. So, they are almost compelled to write code outside of business hours just to prove that they are a real developer. I don’t think that is necessary. Personally, I have a problem with saying that if you’re not writing code outside of your 9-5 job, then you’re not a real programmer. I’m a little wary of that being an expected requirement for somebody. You might really enjoy it, but you might also really enjoy doing other things outside of your day-to-day job. So, there are good and bad parts, I guess, of having that.

Arsalan: Right. I think that in some parts of our industry, some subcultures within our industry, we have taken this too far. You’re absolutely right. I have talked to people and personally experienced some very strange behavior among recruiters and hiring managers. Some people who are not actually going to do the final interview or [make the] final determination will put these filters in because they don’t want to interview a hundred people. They want to interview five people or two people. They want somebody at a higher level of personnel, like Human Resources or a hiring manager, who is not actually doing the coding, to filter people out. They use a degree as a filter sometimes. We have these keywords. So, you have a keyword filter and how many keywords do you have on your resume? Then, you have a Github profile and what is your activity level? [It’s the] heat map for Github. How active have you been? That’s been used for some reason.

Arsalan: You are absolutely right. I am going to say most software developers don’t work in open source. There is no reason why they have to. What ends up happening [is that] we are creating a culture where we are saying that you have to be so passionate and obsessed with programming that that is all you want to do 24/7. That doesn’t mean that a person who writes code 24/7 is necessarily a better software developer than someone who likes to have his 9-5, do a good job, and go home and take care of his kids or play the guitar. We assume that if you are not obsessed with this, it is not going to work. In my experience, it happens a lot with startup companies where they don’t want someone who has another passion because they want them to work 12 hours a day.

Damian: That’s always the danger. Yeah. If you choose someone who is passionate, then you can see that they’re working on side projects and things for a few hours at night. Then, maybe you think that as an employer that you can utilize that time as well. I think that it is a bit of a work/life balance and I am probably a bad example of this. I tend to not write a ton of essential stuff that’s out on Github. I’ll do a little bit, but I also have the problem where, especially if my wife is working late, I’ll just keep working until she gets home. So, I’ll do 18-hour days occasionally just because I really enjoy what I’m doing. I don’t think that it is necessary for me to do that, though. In fact, it’s probably not healthy for me to do that too often. I need to have some other things going on.

Arsalan: Yeah. 18 hours a day may be taking it a little too far, Damian, but on the other hand, you have a cool job which we get to talk about now. You are a developer advocate, but not just a regular one; you are a cloud developer advocate. A lot of our listeners may not know what a developer advocate is [or] may not know what a cloud is. So, let’s talk about what you mean by a cloud and what a developer advocate is.

Damian: So, we’ll start with the cloud, I guess, because I am a bit of a Microsoft person. I work for Microsoft at the moment. So, when I talk about Cloud, I am usually talking about Azure. But, IWS and Google Cloud platform are options as well and they have awesome features. There are really just those three big players in Cloud at the moment. So, when I talk about cloud, I am talking about the developer cloud. There are kind of two types.

Damian: There’s a consumer cloud where you might look at things like DropBox or Apple iCloud or things like that where your general consumer’s photos go, their emails go, and all that kind of stuff.

Damian: The developer cloud is really where programmers will put their stuff. So, rather than having a web server that you host like a rack or a service sitting in an air-conditioned room somewhere in an office that you have to maintain, you can put all your stuff on a cloud that Microsoft, Amazon, Google, or someone like that manages for you. You don’t have to worry about the maintenance of the hardware and, in most cases, you don’t have to worry about the maintenance of the operating system either. You just give it your code; give it the stuff you want to run and it will run it for you. The company will run it for you and they will charge you based on usage, in most cases.

Damian: Lately, the developer clouds have started expanding a little bit in what they can do. So, traditionally, it was more like a server that you can rent, essentially. But, these days the cloud is much more about functionality. So, think of things like cognitive services in the Azure cloud. You can upload a bunch of photos and tag people in what’s in those photos. Artificial intelligence that Microsoft hosts for you will learn about your photos and be able to answer questions that you have later on. You can give it another photo and ask “is John in this photo” and it will give you an answer based on the information that you’ve given it.

Damian: So, it’s really kind of expanding with all the stuff that you can do, but not needing [you] to maintain your own hardware [or] write these complex AI algorithms and things like that from scrap. So, I guess I’ve kind of gone off on a couple of little tangents there, but that’s really what the cloud is. It’s more or less hosted computing and hosted stuff like that. You don’t have to manage [it] yourself. Microsoft, Amazon, Google, or someone like that will manage that for you.

Arsalan: That’s great. That’s a lot of information, but I want to talk about the history of what happened here. Initially, maybe 20 years ago, if you wrote a piece of client-service software or web-based software, then, it needed to run on a powerful computer that everyone in the world could access. You could run it on your own computer, but it isn’t always going to be there and if you have a lot of users, it isn’t always going to work.

Arsalan: Back in the day, we used to run web servers off of our own desktops. I am guilty of that. But now we have realized that we need servers. We need a dedicated hardware machine that doesn’t necessarily have all of the stuff that you need for a computer or for a consumer. I mean, it does have a display, maybe, but it’s very fast. It’s a fast processor. It has a lot of memory. It can allow a lot of people to connect to that computer at the same time. So, that’s where we start and then we make it bigger and bigger and it costs a lot of money to have this running.

Arsalan: We then have to make sure it’s cool because it can generate a lot of heat. So, cooling it is expensive. Then a fault appears and you have to replace it and you have downtime. That used to happen also. I remember back in the day, a corporate server that was running exchange and handling emails and so on would go down occasionally. Then, we would have to wait until it was up again. So, going through that now, a company that has a lot of servers can say “why don’t you rent mine and you don’t have to take care of it. We’ll take care of it for you and then we can take care of millions of other people.”

Arsalan: Now, it becomes something like a utility. So, you pay for what you use. Behind the scenes, if they have to replace hard discs or put new servers in, you don’t have to worry about that. So, now you have a computer that you can just rent in the cloud. So, that’s where I think this whole cloud thing first started, correct me if I am wrong.

Damian: No, go ahead.

Arsalan: You could call it infrastructure as a service. Then, after that, people built software on top of that. So, you can have software as a service like Salesforce that other managed platforms that are running there on top of some kind of cloud infrastructure that you can use as a consumer. You will not know that it is running in the cloud. Or, you can offer it to your customers. Then, we moved on to the platform as services where we are just abstracting away even just the infrastructure or framework around it. All you have to deal with is code.

Arsalan: I think that I am using the correct terminology here. If I have a piece of code that is supposed to run inside of a Microsoft server or in a different type of web server, then maybe Microsoft can give me that web server and I can just tell Microsoft where my code is and to run it. Now that we have Github and the ability to clone and all the wonderful things that we can do with ‘Git,’ I can just tell Microsoft where my Github or my bitbucket repository is. Then, you can just pull the code and build it. If it works, then deploy it. That’s another way. I don’t have to know that there is a computer.

Arsalan: Later on, we moved into even more specialized cloud services where we are not even doing an entire program. We are doing just a little snippet. I can provide this little function for you and it’s going to run in the cloud and there is going to be a server behind it. There’s going to be a hardware processor for this Github memory, location, and all at full tolerance and patches for the operating system. I have no knowledge of that and I don’t care. All I want to know is that this function will run. So, it’d be more like some Lambda functions or cloud functions. I don’t know what Microsoft is calling it.

Arsalan: Lots of platform providers are providing this feature now. So, I see that as an observer. I’m looking at this whole cloud phenomenon as an evolution. It’s almost come to a point where you are expecting that. You are expecting that everyone who has a large infrastructure and who have a lot of users or who may have a lot of loads, they are not going to use their dedicated servers, but something on the cloud. I don’t know if you could talk a little bit about some of the new features that you see evolving in the cloud.

Damian: Yeah, I think you’ve got that trend exactly right. More and more stuff is being taken out of your hands if you liken it to an analogy of electricity. If you had a little generator in your house that would generate electricity, then you have to maintain that bit of hardware and so on. You have to maintain the wiring and stuff like that. Maybe an electricity company can wire it up to your house. Then, you have to worry about the wires that run through the walls of your house and all that kind of stuff. Or, you can just rent a place that has power plugs on all the walls. As long as something works, as long as you have the right power plug, you can just plug it in.

Damian: That’s kind of how it is with this platform as a service thing. You have code that is a particular language and is Microsoft or Amazon or Google, and they know how to execute code in that language. You just have to provide the code. You don’t have to say “well, this isp.net code needs to run on an IS server and it needs to be on this account and all this stuff.” You can just say “here is the code that I want to run when someone hits this URL.” Azure functions give you that ability. If you give Azure a snippet of code and tell it ‘when you do this, execute that snippet of code.’ It’s similar to the AWS Lambda that you mentioned as well.

Damian: So the trend, I guess, is probably taking more of that away from the developer. You don’t need to worry about the things that are pretty much commodity if every time you run a web application it was on an IS server running on a Windows machine and you gave it C# code, but you have to set up that Windows server on that IS machine. Then, let Microsoft do that for you.

Damian: There are other advantages that you get for this as well. Let’s say that you have an e-commerce site that operates in the US. It might have a lot of traffic between 5 PM and midnight every weekday. Yet, between 3 and 4 AM, nobody is visiting that site. If you had your own server, whether it’s your server or an infrastructure server, a rented server from a cloud provider, then you have to worry about what electricity that server is using when nobody is using it. We need to have a machine that is capable of handling the largest load but can also go down to nothing. So, we are wasting all this electricity and power. If you use a cloud provider for your application, and you have them scale it depending on how many people are hitting the thing, then you are not actually getting charged anything if nobody is hitting your site. Suddenly, if you hit a major news program or something and you have millions of people hitting your site, then Azure or whoever it is can scale your application or the hardware behind it up to handle that load. You don’t need to worry about those intricacies. So, that’s another advantage of doing that. Just give it the code and letting Microsoft, Amazon, or Google work out the stuff that is a bit painful to manage yourself.

Arsalan: That’s true. I’m a big proponent of adopting the cloud as your backbone because I, personally, don’t enjoy doing a lot of the infrastructure work. You have to do it when you’re building something from scratch or when you’re testing it. But, for regular maintenance, I don’t know of any developer who likes doing that. So, I appreciate all that. However, I’m just thinking of the conversation we had before we started recording. Your focus these days is on DevOps.

Arsalan: We’ve had DevOps discussed on this podcast before where you are doing some developing and some operations. You’re actually doing something with infrastructure. You’re not just writing code. Let’s take 30 seconds to talk about what DevOps is and then I’ll ask you my question.

Damian: Sure. DevOps means a lot of different things to a lot of different people. I come from a software developer background. So, when I think about DevOps, I think of it as reproducible ways to deploy my code, test it successfully, and make sure that everything works the way it is supposed to work. Microsoft actually has a definition for DevOps, which was written by my boss, Donovan Brown. It is the union of people, process, and products to enable continuous delivery and value to our end users. It is really broad and really just refers to changing the way you operate so that you have a focus on delivering value rather than writing a particular feature that’s on your backlog, for example. That value could actually be things like scaling up your website if you have a lot of traffic. Or, it could be having the ability to recover from a failure if there’s a problem in one of your data centers. But, really the focus is on how you can quickly and repeatedly push software or infrastructure changes out.

Damian: If you come from DevOps with a background in systems administration and operations, there’s a lot more emphasis on making sure that your infrastructure is tolerant, things are able to be repaired more quickly, and you can rebuild servers if they need to be rebuilt, and so on. It all fits into the idea that DevOps is delivering this stuff to your users in a way that adds value to them and quickly and efficiently doing your best so that it works the way that it’s supposed to work.

Arsalan: I think that’s a very good definition. The way that I’ve heard it described by some other people who I’ve listened to in the past is that essentially you’re taking responsibility not only for the correct function of your software but also the correct operations. That means that if something is wrong in the infrastructure or there is anything wrong that stops your production site from functioning, then instead of having two different people (one responsible for fixing the code and pushing it out and the other person for making sure that it keeps running) you combine these two roles into one person. You are responsible for both.

Arsalan: So, my question was that if you think of DevOps like this, it makes sense if I’m running a hardware rack in the back of my office, then I [also] have to manage many different things. It makes sense for efficiency’s sake. The one person who knows the product or the software intimately would be responsible for making sure that it runs and would hope that once you’ve identified and ironed out the kinks that it continues to run. If there’s a problem that pops up, that same person is notified [because] they are familiar with it. That makes sense, but I’m wondering how that works in the cloud because now I feel that a lot of those responsibilities are taken over by the cloud company. Microsoft is doing the patches and maybe even pulling my code down and they are deploying it. So, does that mean that we don’t really need DevOps anymore?

Damian: No, I don’t think so at all. So, it does change a little bit with the cloud, but rather than the busy work of making sure that patches are up to date and you have the appropriate network activity and things like that, your emphasis can be more of making sure that everything is running correctly and efficiently. [That’s true] even if you back up to the deployment of the software where your job may have previously been provisioning a server, ordering something from a manufacturer and getting it in, putting it into the racks, wiring it up, installing all the software and operating systems, and making sure that everything is right.

Damian: You don’t have to worry about that stuff anymore, but you still need experts who can say what this application means. This is what this application needs to run. So, the traditional DevOps role, traditional operations role, can transition to “well, the resources that we need to run this application are these things. There’s a web application that runs under app services.”

Damian: In Azure, for example, here are the scaling settings that we need. Once it reaches a particular percentage of usage, it will then scale up to another one. Maybe we need to separate one resource group from another to provide a bit of isolation. Here’s an entire test environment that’s going to duplicate that. More importantly, here’s the monitoring that’s required. Here are the thresholds that mean that we need to look at something that’s going wrong. If there are more than these many exceptions in this area over a particular time then you need to be notified. We need to make sure that the information we get is such that we can identify what the actual problems are. So, there is still plenty of work left to do within that respect.

Damian: In terms of the actual deployment of the software, there’s a lot that goes on. If you’re writing a website, for example, it’s not really enough to say here’s my web application and there’s my code and that is my website. Do the sync whenever it’s required. Usually, there are plenty of other things that need to happen.

Damian: There are databases involved. There are other backend systems that need activity. There are notifications that need to go out to people. There are approval processes to get things approved to go into production. So, that whole process becomes part of the DevOps role. When I say DevOps role, by the way, this is something that the team should own rather than having an individual DevOps team or DevOps person. Ownership should really belong to the entire team. You may have operations specialists. You may have monitoring specialists. You may have software – the programmers themselves who are specialists on the application as well. But the team as a whole owns what ends up in production.

Arsalan: Yes, I think that’s an excellent answer. DevOps is alive and well, folks. So, if you are listening to this podcast and you are having second thoughts about DevOps as a feature of your career, don’t give up. There is hope.

Arsalan: In this podcast, we like to talk about the technologies that people are working on because it’s really fun and exciting to know that there are so many possibilities and this is an opportunity for us to learn. So, I really appreciate it, Damian, that you gave us a chance to learn from you about your experiences and what you are passionate about.

Arsalan: We also want to talk about how you got started and how you got your first break or your first job because a lot of us are struggling. We may have some coursework in computer science. We may have a degree. We may have some experience doing side projects. We may have a little bit of experience, but a lot of us are still struggling to get our first jobs. So, from your point of view, I’d love to know you got your first job.

Damian: My story about getting my first job is probably not terribly exciting. I finished at the university, put a resume together, and then started applying for positions. The first job I got was a government one. It was in a language that I hadn’t really touched very much, which was all the .Net stuff. So, it was very traditional. I finished my degree. I applied for a job and went to a few interviews and then got an offer. Subsequent jobs, though, have been very different. There have been a few that I’ve applied for, but, especially lately, I’ve kind of followed what I’m interested in.

Damian: The really great thing about software, I think, is that there are so many different areas that you can go into. You can fall into stuff that you really like and it can be completely different from the person next to you. I have a bunch of people who I went to the university with. We did exactly the same degree, but we barely speak the same language when it comes to writing software, even though we are technically software developers. So, there’s a huge range. I think that [for] the climate I was in at the moment, it was just important to get a job, any job.

Damian: I don’t know if that’s the case anymore. I think that these days it’s more important to find something that aligns more with what you enjoy in software rather than just picking up whatever is available. But, if that is what you end up doing, picking up any job that’s available, you can definitely lean towards the stuff that you do enjoy, which is kind of where I ended up.

Arsalan: Sometimes you have to take a few steps before you get to your destination. Here’s what I’ve noticed. In a lot of cases, I’ve found successful software developers. When they started, they did not start in jobs or even in places where they wanted to be. But, they lucked into being surrounded by other people who are really knowledgeable and helpful, even though they were doing something else. Just by being in that environment, they were able to learn and grow. So, there is the opportunity.

Arsalan: Obviously, if you are a new software developer and you want a job, there are many ways of getting it. We talk about this on this podcast. If you want to learn more about some of the different ways of how you could get a job, then go ahead and email me at us@mentoringdevelopers.com. I will reply and send you some resources and we can start a conversation.

Arsalan: If you could start over, Damian, what would you do differently as a new developer? Are there things that you did that you kind of think “boy, I wish I hadn’t done that.”

Damian: I don’t know that there’s anything that I wouldn’t have done, but I definitely would’ve done some things a bit earlier than I did them. It took me a while to realize that I could pursue the parts of the job that I was interested in. For the first seven or eight years of being a programmer, I thought that I was at the mercy of whoever was employing me. Every bit of software development that I did was going to be based on exactly what my boss told me it was going to be. I was going to be pigeon-holed in a particular language, a particular type of software and things like that.

Damian: It took me about eight years to realize that I can read stuff that I’m interested in. I can emphasize the parts of the job that I like, even without really changing my job. We have a saying in my group of Microsoft DevOps-focused Cloud developer advocates that you shouldn’t ask permission to do your job properly. So, if you, as a programmer, think that it is really important for you to speak to the customer about what they actually meant when they asked for a feature, then you shouldn’t need to ask permission to speak to the customer. The same goes for tests. If you think tests are important, you can do that. That’s part of being a professional.

Damian: That led me eventually to where I am now. I thought that one of the things that I really enjoy was learning new stuff and teaching it to other people. So, I started doing that. I would find a bit of code that I had to write as part of a feature – that was my job description, essentially, to write this particular feature. I would find a part of that, that I was quite interested in, and I dove a little deeper into how to make that work really well. Then, once I learned that there was this great algorithm for compressing images or something, which was fascinating, I would end up teaching other people those bits of information because I found that very interesting.

Damian: That led to this whole developer advocacy thing where it has become my job to learn things and then teach other people. So, even within my own job, I was able to focus even more on the things that I liked and maybe my next job would focus even more on it. The one after that might focus even more. You make your own path, rather than being pigeon-holed. It took me a long time to realize that I was able to do that.

Arsalan: I think this is excellent advice. Obviously, you can think outside the box. A lot of times, our managers or the people who are managing us really know what we should do. A new developer would go in and think that the people who are managing them or who are more senior know exactly how to tackle every situation. So, they need to be told what to do because [they] don’t know and that person knows everything. In a lot of cases, we are all learning. When we start a software project, we may not even know what to do even if we have 10, 15, 20, or even 30 years of experience.  We may have never done something exactly like that. So, if a junior person comes up and takes initiative and reaches out to a customer or writes tests, most of us are going to appreciate that.

Damian: Yeah.

Arsalan: I have been in situations, Damian, where it is not appreciated. So, let me be clear. Writing tests or talking to customers is scoffed at. It happens in situations where maybe some of that is not billable or some of that does not add to the bottom line of the company. Those types of political things happen.

Arsalan: For most organizations, especially for in-house developers or for people who are really invested in the software product, they will appreciate any initiative that you show. That means that they don’t have to think for you. You can think for yourself. You are going to be an asset to the company, not a liability.

Damian: Yeah, that’s exactly right. I’ve worked in plenty of those places as well where you tested a few things that you wrote if you had time, but, of course, you never have time. In those scenarios, I think you just have to do your best at what the best thing is for writing good software and delivering value to customers. Yet, at some point, if you’re not getting any momentum, you can’t change that culture. If you feel like it really needs to change, then maybe what really needs to change is which job you’re in.

Damian: There are organizations that are going to say “we don’t have time to do DevOps. We don’t have time to do Agile. We don’t have time to do tests.” There’s not a lot you can do to change that. What you can change is where you work.

Arsalan: What’s exciting about 2018 and beyond is that there are so many jobs regardless of where you live. There are a lot of remote jobs as well. If you live in a city or a town where you don’t have a lot of opportunities, maybe there is an opportunity somewhere else. So, don’t give up. If you’re in a situation that is hurting you in becoming a good software developer and a good professional, a lot of times our work environments are not professional, you should feel free to move on. Even if you are at a dream job, you shouldn’t think that you should retire from there.

Arsalan: I think that our society as a whole has moved on from that idea of getting a job and then staying there forever. At least in the US, the employers don’t guarantee you a job at all. So, you shouldn’t feel obligated to stay there until everything falls apart. That doesn’t mean that I encourage job-hopping. I’ve seen some really aggressive job-hopping in my career where some people would change jobs in weeks or in a couple of months. That doesn’t give you anything.

Damian: Yeah, definitely. You could try to change what happens in an organization before jumping away. I think the average is about two and a half to three years in a job and then I leave, but not because I hate the place and can’t work there anymore. I leave because I don’t feel like I’m growing anymore. I’m doing the same stuff day-to-day. I’m not learning anything new. It’s not working out for either party then. They basically have someone doing the exact same thing that anybody else could do. I’m not learning or enjoying it and it’s time to move on.

Damian: If something is not working, then it would be great for the company and for you if you were able to change that in the organization. You can’t do that in a week. So, give it a go for a while and then if it’s just not working, then maybe look at other options. I think that’s good advice.

Arsalan: The most important thing that I like to tell new developers is to not give up. Stay in the game. If you stay in the game long enough, you will succeed. There are plenty of opportunities out there. There is something just right for you. Yet, obviously, if you don’t like software development, then don’t be a software developer. But, if you want to be a software developer, let nothing stop you like a bad job, a bad boss, bad technology, or bad choices. All of that can change.

Arsalan: I’ve seen companies change from within and be completely transformed. A bad boss can leave and a new boss can come in. Or, maybe you could become the boss. That happens too. I’ve even seen situations where a company is using really old technology because that’s all they know. Then, all of a sudden, there’s a new budget and more money. If you talk to the right people, the technology changes and now they are doing Agile and Scrums and they have Kanban boards going and you’re now working on an open source or some other technology that you’re excited about. So, it can happen. Or, you could just move on and find another job. Maybe, if you have a couple of years’ experience, you could go out on your own. I’ve seen people become independent consultants. I’ve done that and sometimes that works out really well.

Arsalan: If you’re listening to this podcast in 2018 or 2019 and so on, you’re in a good place. This is a good time to be a software developer. Right, Damian?

Damian: Definitely. I would agree.

Arsalan: It’s been a pleasure talking to you – so much amazing advice. I think people are going to love this episode. There are so many more questions that I could ask you, but we’re coming up to an hour and I think we need to stop. Before we go, I want to give you a chance, Damian, to talk to my audience and give them a message if you like. Give them advice or talk about something that you’re working on, that you’re passionate about, and that you’d like them to check out.

Damian: There are so many things. One thing that I would say as a result of me starting to work at Microsoft about 8 months ago is that Microsoft is a very different company for developers than it used to be. A huge amount of our code is out on Github now. It’s open source. Their whole developer advocacy group, which is the group that I’m part of, our job description is to literally help people succeed.

Damian: If you’re in the industry and a little jaded about Microsoft from the days of forcing upgrades and all sorts of developer stuff that went on a while ago, have another look. Azure is primarily the Linux server these days. Microsoft is one of the largest contributors to the Linux code base. I think it is the largest contributor to open source according to some Github stats as well. It’s a very different story these days. I’d have another look.

Damian: If you want to learn how to use any of Azure, a great starting point is docs.microsoft.com. There are some work-throughs, videos, and all sorts of stuff. You can also reach out to any of the Cloud developer advocates, too. We should be very easy to find. I think it’s developer.microsoft.com. That’s our job – to help you succeed, and to some extent, whether you’re using Microsoft or not. So, reach out and if you have any problems with anything, we’ll have a look at the docs. Things have changed at Microsoft.

Arsalan: If you want to talk to Damian or you want to send him a message and can’t find him, you can always find me at mentoringdevelopers.com. This is going to be episode 66. You’ll be able to find links for everything that Damian is talking about, show notes, and transcripts at mentoringdevelopers.com/episode66. It’s easy. So, if you want to find another episode, like episode 60, all you have to do is change it to mentoringdevelopers.com/episode60. So, all URLs are fun like that. I am also very responsive to email at us@mentoringdevelopers.com. If you want to send a message to Damian and you want to ask me and Damian something, I will make sure that I forward your request to Damian if you want. Or, you can reach out to Damian directly.

Arsalan: Alright, Damian, it was a pleasure talking to you.

Damian: You too, Arsalan. Thank you very much for taking the time.

Arsalan: Thank you so much, and thank you, everybody, for listening. See you later.

[convertkit form=4889308]

Important Links

• Twitter: @damovisa
• Blog: https://damovisa.me
• Cloud Developer Advocates: https://developer.microsoft.com/advocates
• Microsoft Docs: https://docs.microsoft.com
• What is DevOps?: https://www.visualstudio.com/learn/what-is-devops/

Thanks for Listening!

Do you have some feedback or some advice for us or our audience? Please give us a review on iTunes or Stitcher and share your thoughts.

If you found this episode useful, please go ahead and share it with your friends and family. You can do that easily using the social media buttons at the bottom of this page.

Subscribe to the show on iTunes or Stitcher (for Android users) to automatically get new episodes every Tuesday.